All categories

New on arXiv

Every paper first posted in arXiv's listing for Thu, Nov 5, 2026 in the 44 categories covered here: 1,184 papers, each shown once (a paper listed in several categories is shown under its own). New versions of older papers are not included. arXiv announces a new listing Sunday to Thursday evenings (US Eastern time), dated the next day, and none on Friday or Saturday evenings, so over a weekend the newest listing is Friday's. The feeds this page reads update at midnight Eastern time, so each listing arrives here shortly after midnight.

Sort: by field | by arXiv number | trending

0 of 0 on this page reviewed
  1. WISE: An Agentic Framework for Whole-page Multimodal Search Experience Attribution

    Wenyi Xu, Renzhe Zhou, Songyang Li and 6 more Information retrieval

    Algorithm-driven services, including search, recommendation, and advertising, rely on multi-stage model pipelines. While research prioritizes model optimization, post-deployment monitoring focuses on operational reliability. Yet operationally healthy systems may still produce poor-quality results, exposing a gap in existing evaluation and monitoring practices. However, a systematic problem...

  2. Deliberate Latent Reasoning for Sequential Recommendation

    Haobo Zhang, Qiannan Zhu, Yutao Zhu and 1 more Information retrieval

    Sequential recommenders are widely applied in real-world scenarios to model user preferences and behavior patterns based on user interactions. Recent advances in sequential recommendation enhance transformer-based models with latent reasoning to refine user representations by autoregressively generating intermediate reasoning vectors. However, exploring the optimal reasoning depth for diverse...

  3. PMRecBench: A Benchmark for Personalization in Recommendation Agents under Multimodal Queries

    Xiaoyu Zhang, Yougang Lyu, Bin Wu and 2 more Information retrieval

    On Web platforms for shopping and entertainment, recommendation agents under multimodal queries aim to deliver personalized recommendations that satisfy users' visually specified requirements and reflect preferences inferred from user histories. However, existing personalized recommendation benchmarks use text-only queries, while multimodal ones assess query matching without evaluating...

  4. Generative Retrieval under Real-Time Supply Constraints in Local Commerce

    Shaopeng Liang, Biao Zhang, Hongzhen Ye and 8 more Information retrieval

    Generative retrieval predicts semantic identifiers for candidate entities. In local retail and food delivery, candidates must also be serviceable for a particular user at a particular time. Location, weather, and traffic reshape merchant and product supply, so a catalog-valid identifier may be infeasible for the current request. Post-generation filtering removes such candidates only after beam...

  5. Do Search-Augmented Recommenders Use the Latest Search Episode?

    Jiandong Ding Information retrieval

    Search-augmented recommenders can use the latest search episode and earlier searches. We introduce FocalSwap to test how these inputs contribute to the next recommendation. For each recommendation, it changes the latest search slot or all search inputs while holding the target, candidates, pre-search history, and scorer fixed. It compares neutral masks with matched observed-search replacements,...

  6. One Basket, Many Experts: Decorrelated Re-ranking for Financial Asset Recommendation

    Ryuki Unno, Keigo Sakurai, Koshi Watanabe and 3 more Information retrieval

    Financial asset recommendation for retail investors is typically optimized for relevance, that is, how well a recommendation matches what each user will buy. From the service provider's point of view, the value of a recommendation also depends on portfolio performance: the risk-adjusted return the recommended assets (the basket) deliver, which drives user engagement and fee revenue. The two goals...

  7. Optimal Re-Ranking Depth

    Siqing Huo, Andrew Parry, Debasis Ganguly and 1 more Information retrieval

    Second-stage neural rankers are commonly applied with a fixed re-ranking depth, assuming that retrieval effectiveness saturates as depth increases. Prior research has questioned the assumption that increasing the re-ranking depth yields linear performance gains, further suggesting that optimal re-ranking depth varies considerably from query to query. In the past, studying such phenomena was...

  8. Weaver: Weaving Preference Evidence through Incremental Reasoning for Personalized Retrieval-Augmented Generation

    Linyao Zheng, Zhifang Mao, Xuhang Shi Information retrieval

    Personalized retrieval-augmented generation requires extracting and applying user preferences from extended interaction histories. This task is challenging because preference evidence is scattered across past conversations and remains bound to specific temporal and situational contexts. Consequently, isolated fragments rarely provide complete support for a response, while preferences expressed...

  9. SciToT: Multimodal Tip-of-the-Tongue Retrieval for Scientific Papers

    Stan Fris, Sijie Tao, Makoto P. Kato and 1 more Information retrieval

    Researchers frequently encounter difficulties re-finding scientific papers when they remember aspects of the content but cannot recall reliable identifiers, such as titles or author names. This type of re-finding task, known as tip-of-the-tongue (ToT) retrieval, is particularly challenging for scientific documents, where recollections may involve textual information and visual elements, including...

  10. Item Representations Matter: Bridging Hard Semantic IDs and Soft Prototype Mixtures for Generative Retrieval

    Vicente Balmaseda, Dongqi Fu, Jiarui Feng and 6 more Information retrieval

    Modern recommender systems rely on generative retrieval techniques to predict the next item either as discrete codes or as a continuous vector. On the one hand, Semantic IDs (SIDs) give discrete models shared parameters and pretrained semantic structure, but discretizing items into hard codes discards some information from the original content embeddings. On the other hand, continuous models...

Only titles, authors and the start of each abstract are shown here, as arXiv published them. Open a paper to read its whole abstract and, with your own AI key, a plain-language summary. Papers on arXiv are preprints and may not have been peer reviewed.

Data from arXiv, used through the arXiv API. Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability.