All categories

New on arXiv

Every paper first posted in arXiv's listing for Thu, Nov 5, 2026 in the 44 categories covered here: 1,184 papers, each shown once (a paper listed in several categories is shown under its own). New versions of older papers are not included. arXiv announces a new listing Sunday to Thursday evenings (US Eastern time), dated the next day, and none on Friday or Saturday evenings, so over a weekend the newest listing is Friday's. The feeds this page reads update at midnight Eastern time, so each listing arrives here shortly after midnight.

Sort: by field | by arXiv number | trending

0 of 0 on this page reviewed
  1. CellCanon: An Agentic Cellular World Model for Prediction, Explanation, and Observation-Driven Updating

    Zhaokang Liang, Shuyang Zhuang, Xiaoran Jiao and 1 more Quantitative methods

    Biological discovery requires using molecular knowledge and new measurements to infer responses beyond the conditions already observed. We introduce CellCanon, the first agentic cellular world model to unify single-cell expression prediction, evidence-grounded explanation, and observation-driven updating. Its predictive core reuses condition-level biological evidence across gene-specific...

  2. Morpheus.AI: agents autonomously generate, execute and refine virtual tissue models

    Prerana Chandratre, Anjali Sharma, Justin B\"urger Michaelis and 4 more Quantitative methods

    Virtual tissue models link observations to mechanistic hypotheses, but building them demands expertise in biology, mathematics and programming. Here, large language model (LLM) agents paired with the simulator Morpheus (Morpheus.AI) autonomously built such models from fifteen benchmark studies, five without a published model. With a frontier LLM, agents that ran their simulations met 83-86% of...

  3. Deep-Learning Algorithm for Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: Comparison and Combination with Molecular Testing

    Jichen Yang, Jeffrey Ashton, Jikai Zhang and 2 more Quantitative methods

    Thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology (Bethesda III) carry an intermediate risk of malignancy, and molecular testing is widely used to decide between surgery and surveillance, but it is costly and not universally available. We investigated whether a convolutional neural network (CNN) applied to routine ultrasound images can stratify Bethesda III nodules, and how it compares and combines...

  4. AcupunctureBench: A Multimodal Benchmark for Evaluating Generative Models in the Acupuncture Domain

    Shusheng Li, Yifei Qu, Zichen Han and 12 more Quantitative methods

    As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied in the field of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), standardized benchmark evaluations for TCM have gradually emerged. Acupuncture is a crucial component of TCM. However, existing evaluation benchmarks are lacking in this domain. To address this gap, this paper proposes AcupunctureBench, the first independently constructed large-scale...

  5. AgentCount: An Agentic Workflow for Traceable Colony Counting and Insight Generation from Agar Plate Images

    Zhuosheng Liu, Austin E. Weber Quantitative methods

    Colony counting is commonly used to evaluate microbial populations in food safety testing and microbiological studies. Despite its wide application, manual counting is time-consuming and operator-dependent, and the final count often lacks a record of the objects included in the measurement. To address these limitations, this study presents AgentCount, an open-source agentic workflow for colony...

  6. A System One Approach to General Protein Evolution

    Yibo Wen, Han Liu Quantitative methods

    Protein engineering requires deciding which mutation to test next and when to stop. Existing approaches often require target-family measurements, encode candidates separately, or return scores that are not calibrated to the assay. We introduce Pev, a general mutation policy that explores a System One approach to protein evolution: learning from experiments across families to make decisions in a...

Only titles, authors and the start of each abstract are shown here, as arXiv published them. Open a paper to read its whole abstract and, with your own AI key, a plain-language summary. Papers on arXiv are preprints and may not have been peer reviewed.

Data from arXiv, used through the arXiv API. Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability.